Campsfield Immigration Removal Centre: 20 Years Too Long

Jo Hynes - 23rd June 2014

Campsfield House, an immigration removal centre in Kidlington run by Mitie for profit, is now in its 20th year of operation.

Twenty years of detention without trial, without time limit, without proper judicial oversight and with little chance of bail for the detainees- all just 6 miles north of Oxford.

Campsfield detention centre on first glance certainly looks like a prison; its category C prison security would certainly suggest so. Yet it is far from such. In theory, detainees are supposed to be held here for a short, temporary period before they are deported, if it is deemed a risk that they will abscond. Instead, a system of indefinite detention, largely for administrative reasons, has arisen, with the average detention lasting 4-5 months, and some for 2-3 years. This creates a dual uncertainty hanging over detainees, since some have been held here for several years, yet simultaneously deportations can occur with next to no warning, in some cases the next day.

The UK detains more migrants, for longer and with less judicial oversight, than any other country in Europe. We are also the country in which the role of private companies in running detention centres (7 out of 10 detention centres) is most prominent. The Council of Europe’s Human Rights Commissioner, as well as organisations such as Amnesty International, have called on the UK to revise its immigration detention policy and reverse the trend to ever-more immigration detention- even the Lib Dems in their latest Immigration Policy Paper propose to end indefinite detention for administrative purposes. The facts are clear: immigration detention doesn’t act as a supposed deterrent to immigration and contravenes basic human rights.

In the past month Campsfield has seen a 50 detainee strong hunger strike, after one detainee, Mauladad Kaukar, was forced to sign a voluntary deportation form, despite speaking no English and not having the form explained to him. Both him and Muswar Khan, another detainee who could speak English and who was advocating on his behalf, were both racially abused by staff and threatened with solitary confinement. In the case of Muswar Khan, he has also had his access to the internet and right to work in the centre taken away, after staff realised he was writing emails concerning Mauladad’s treatment and for labelling the previously unlabelled Independent Monitoring Board complaints box. The hunger strike has since stopped, but Muswar has brought Mauladad’s case to the Chair of the Independent Monitoring Board. Yet with 31 of the 45 complaints made by detainees being referred back to the centre to be dealt with internally, according to the IMB’s most recent annual report, Muswar is sceptical about this achieving much.

Since the opening of the centre, an active Close Campsfield campaign has been in operation to work for its closure. This past month the group, alongside Oxford University Amnesty International, have been coordinating an open letter to David Cameron, condemning Campsfield detention centre and the principle of indefinite detention. So far the letter has the support of over 40 academics, including several Heads of Houses, Ken MacDonald QC and Professor Danny Dorling.

Not often do such blatant abuses of human rights happen so systematically, so openly and so close to home.

 

If you would like to join the movement calling for the closure of Campsfield and become a signatory to the open letter or would simply like more information, please email amnesty@nexus.ox.ac.uk or visit http://closecampsfield.wordpress.com/.

Author profile

Jo Hynes is a second year geography undergraduate at Oxford University and President of Oxford University Amnesty International 2014-5.

Citations

Jo Hynes, “Campsfield Immigration Removal Centre: 20 Years Too Long,” (OxHRH Blog, 23 June 2014) <http://humanrights.dev3.oneltd.eu/?p=11500> [date of access].

Comments

  1. joseph says:

    Your article does not mention why mauladad kakaur is here in England. If he is here legitimately why would he be deported? Strange article indeed!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *