• Home
  • About us
  • People
  • Blog
  • News
  • Video
  • Webinars
  • Seminars
  • Podcasts
  • Publications
    • Journal Articles
    • Working Papers
    • OxHRH Annual Report
    • Books & Chapters
    • U of OxHRH Journal
  • Events
  • Journal
  • Oxford Pro Bono Publico
    • History and Impact
    • Team
    • Working with OPBP
    • Project Database
    • Internship Programme
  • Home
  • About us
  • People
  • Blog
  • News
  • Media
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Journal

RightsUp – Episode 2 – ‘Some Sort of Monster?’: The Benefits and Burdens of Human Rights for Business

admin - 14th May 2015
OxHRH
Business & Resources & Environment & Development

Welcome to RightsUp, a podcast from the Oxford Human Rights Hub. We look at the big human rights issues of the day, bringing in new perspectives from all over the world by talking to experts, academics, practicing lawyers, activists and policy makers who are at the forefront of tackling these difficult issues.

Episode 2: ‘Some Sort of Monster?’: The Benefits and Burdens of Human Rights for Business

Is business a threat to human rights? Or an enabler of human rights? Some see business in our world today as a threat  — institutions that undermine workers’ rights and interfere with governments.  Others see business as an enabler of human rights — job creators, innovators and supporters of social mobility.  So, cutting through these differences, what are the real human rights issues that relate to business? Are human rights a business benefit or burden?

This episode was written, edited and produced by Kira Allmann, Laura Hilly and Max Harris.  With special thanks to Prof Sandra Fredman, Tom Peach and our guests.  Music written and performed by Rosemary Allmann.

Stream Episode 2 below, and don’t forget to subscribe on iTunesU!

http://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Ep2_FINAL1.mp3

Resources:

  • David Bilchitz ‘The Necessity for a Business and Human Rights Treaty’ (SSRN, 30 November 2014)
  • Karl Laird ‘Corporate Gods: Can a Company Claim Protection for Religious Belief’ (OxHRH Blog, 3 January 2013)
  • Karl Laird ‘Burwell v Hobby Lobby – a Narrow Decision?’ (OxHRH Blog, 2 July 2014)

United Nations and NGO Documents:

  • United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (2011)
  • United Nations General Assembly Resolution 21/5 on ‘Contribution of the United Nations system as a whole to the advancement of the business and human rights agenda and the dissemination and implementation of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights’ (A/HRC/RES/21/5, 16 October 2012)
  • Chris Albin-Lackey, ‘Without Rules: A Failed Approach to Corporate Accountability’ (Human Rights Watch)

Cases referred to in this podcast:

  • Citizens United v Federal Election Commission 558 U.S. __(2010)
  • Burwell, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al c Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc, et al 573 U.S. __(2014)
  • Nemtsov v Russia (1774/11) European Court of Human Rights, 31 July 2014

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related blog posts

Multinational Royal Dutch Shell summoned for insufficient efforts in combatting climate change
UK Supreme Court’s Vedanta Case – Hope for Zambian Communities Affected by Mining Pollution
Gabriel Resources v. Romania: Local Residents as Third Parties in Investor-State Dispute Settlement?

Related events

The Business and Human Rights debate : Lessons from the Bodo Community v Shell Litigation in the United Kingdom-Dan Leader (Leigh Day)

Related news

Inaugural Seminar for Oxford Climate Migration Network

Contact Us

oxfordhumanrightshub@law.ox.ac.uk

Oxford Human Rights Hub
The Faculty of Law, University of Oxford,
St Cross Building,
St Cross Road,
Oxford OX1 3UL

© 2019 Oxford Human Rights Hub | Site by One


Sign up for the OHRH Newsletter

Your email address*:

New email sign up
reCAPTCHA
* Find out how we use your data