Balanced Constitutionalism-Chintan Chandrachud (Quinn Emanuel)

by | Apr 20, 2017

“Balanced Constitutionalism” examines the promise of the “new model” of judicial review against its performance in practice – by comparing judicial review under the Human Rights Act, 1998 (UK) to an exemplar of the old model of judicial review, the Indian Constitution. Based on a thorough analysis of judicial decisions and legislative responses in both nations, it argues that although the Human Rights Act fosters a more balanced allocation of powers between legislatures and courts than the Indian Constitution, it does so for a different reason from that offered by scholars. Balanced constitutionalism is not achieved through the legislative rejection of judicial decision-making about rights. Instead, the nature of the remedy under the Human Rights Act – the “declaration of incompatibility” – enables British courts to assert their genuine understandings of rights in situations in which Indian courts find it difficult to do so.

In this talk, the author focuses on the institutional apparatus accompanying the declaration of incompatibility in the UK on the one hand, and informal recommendations to change the law in India on the other. Although the declaration of incompatibility may look like a freestanding advisory remedy at first glance, it is given significant institutional purchase by the UK Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) and the European Court of Human Rights. The JCHR presses the government to engage with declarations of incompatibility, ensuring that silence is not realistic option. The European Court usually compels the Westminster Parliament to change the law following a declaration of incompatibility. The work of these institutions will be compared with India’s National Human Rights Commission, which finds it difficult to influence legislative activity on both of these counts.

This event is co-hosted with the South Asian Law Discussion Group.

 

Share this:

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Related Content

Two Models of Normative Framework for Human Rights during Emergencies- James Nickel (University of Miami)

Two Models of Normative Framework for Human Rights during Emergencies- James Nickel (University of Miami)

This lecture seeks to stimulate new thinking about emergency frameworks for human rights. It suggests that the ...
Event: Film Screening ‘Nowhere Home’ Thursday, 22 January 2015

Event: Film Screening ‘Nowhere Home’ Thursday, 22 January 2015

Please join the Oxford Children's Rights Network on a screening of the film "Nowhere Home” on Thursday, January ...
Open Letter from International Lawyers Garners Over 900 Signatures

Open Letter from International Lawyers Garners Over 900 Signatures

This Open Letter emerged from a session on ‘Refugee Crisis and Europe’ that took place at the 11th Annual ...