<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: High Court of Australia delivers landmark ruling that Indigenous Australians cannot be deported	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/high-court-of-australia-delivers-landmark-ruling-that-indigenous-australians-cannot-be-deported/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/high-court-of-australia-delivers-landmark-ruling-that-indigenous-australians-cannot-be-deported/</link>
	<description>Oxford Human Rights Hub</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2023 18:24:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Kishor Dere		</title>
		<link>https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/high-court-of-australia-delivers-landmark-ruling-that-indigenous-australians-cannot-be-deported/#comment-188131</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kishor Dere]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 14:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/?p=69272#comment-188131</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Many thanks to the High Court of Australia for delivering such a wonderful judgment that &quot;indigenous Australians cannot be deported&quot;. Response of  Australian Government to this decision is also noteworthy.  The Government&#039;s view that the HCA left open the question of whether the Australian Parliament could restrict or modify indigenous connection to land and waters by statute. The Govt. also  clarified that it may seek to rely on a different constitutional basis to legislate for the deportation of indigenous non-citizens. As this debate keeps getting enriched by diametrically opposite arguments,  the gulf between the views of judiciary and those of government and parliament could be substantially narrowed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks to the High Court of Australia for delivering such a wonderful judgment that &#8220;indigenous Australians cannot be deported&#8221;. Response of  Australian Government to this decision is also noteworthy.  The Government&#8217;s view that the HCA left open the question of whether the Australian Parliament could restrict or modify indigenous connection to land and waters by statute. The Govt. also  clarified that it may seek to rely on a different constitutional basis to legislate for the deportation of indigenous non-citizens. As this debate keeps getting enriched by diametrically opposite arguments,  the gulf between the views of judiciary and those of government and parliament could be substantially narrowed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
