Comments on: Inevitability as the New Discrimination Defence: UK Supreme Court Mangles Indirect Discrimination Analysis While Finding the Two-Child Limit Lawful https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/inevitability-as-the-new-discrimination-defence-uk-supreme-court-mangles-indirect-discrimination-analysis-while-finding-the-two-child-limit-lawful/ Oxford Human Rights Hub Wed, 28 Jul 2021 12:01:18 +0000 hourly 1 By: Rona Epstein https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/inevitability-as-the-new-discrimination-defence-uk-supreme-court-mangles-indirect-discrimination-analysis-while-finding-the-two-child-limit-lawful/#comment-191371 Tue, 27 Jul 2021 14:28:05 +0000 https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/?p=77914#comment-191371 I’m writing to say that in my view this is an excellent article. I agree with every word. Your article covers such an important topic, and you’ve put all the arguments with clarity and conviction. I wonder if the case will now go to the European Court of Human Rights. Do you think there’s a chance of success there? (Following their decision that punishment for begging was against the ECHR — see https://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/resources/now-more-ever-penalisation-poverty-must-stop )

Rona Epstein Coventry Law School

https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/05/21/it-is-more-urgent-than-ever-that-we-end-the-criminalisation-of-poverty/

https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/brutality-and-false-imprisonment-welcome-to-the-uk/

]]>