Standard of Review

Reflecting on the Right to Self-Determination as the Primary Ground for Protection of Indigenous Peoples in Voluntary Isolation and Initial Contact

Reflecting on the Right to Self-Determination as the Primary Ground for Protection of Indigenous Peoples in Voluntary Isolation and Initial Contact

From 21 April to 2 May 2025, the UN Headquarters in New York hosted the 24th session of the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII) which endorsed the...
The Internationally Recognised Right to Conscientious Objection Under Real Risk in Ukraine

The Internationally Recognised Right to Conscientious Objection Under Real Risk in Ukraine

Going into the fourth year of resistance of the Ukrainian nation to Russian aggression, a lack of soldiers is one of the main problems of Ukrainian reality. The Ukrainian government...
Courting the Heat: India’s Legal Reckoning with Climate-Driven Heatwaves

Courting the Heat: India’s Legal Reckoning with Climate-Driven Heatwaves

As India suffers through yet another year of scorching summers, heatwaves have turned into a recurring and lethal aspect of the climate crisis. Statistics capture only a fraction of a...
Hacia Un Sistema De Native Title (Título Nativo) Justo Y Equitativo: ¿Es Suficiente La Conexión “Espiritual” Para Reclamar Derechos De Título Nativo?

Hacia Un Sistema De Native Title (Título Nativo) Justo Y Equitativo: ¿Es Suficiente La Conexión “Espiritual” Para Reclamar Derechos De Título Nativo?

El 9 de abril de 2025, la High Court of Australia admitió unanimemente con lugar una apelación en contra de una decisión de la Full Court of the Federal Court...
Towards A Just And Equitable Native Title System: Is “Spiritual” Connection Sufficient To Claim Native Title Rights?

Towards A Just And Equitable Native Title System: Is “Spiritual” Connection Sufficient To Claim Native Title Rights?

On 9th April 2025, the High Court of Australia unanimously allowed an appeal in Stuart v South Australia from a decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court of...
Reopening Finality: Capital Punishment on Trial (Again)

Reopening Finality: Capital Punishment on Trial (Again)

Capital punishment has been the subject of considerable judicial discourse in India, a significant part of which has focused on isolating the right to life from sweeping judicial discretion in...
A Manifest Lack of Justice?: The ICJ’s Decision in Sudan v. United Arab Emirates

A Manifest Lack of Justice?: The ICJ’s Decision in Sudan v. United Arab Emirates

On 5 March 2025, Sudan submitted an application instituting proceedings against the United Arab Emirates (UAE) at the International Court of Justice (ICJ/Court), alleging that the UAE is in violation...
Judicial Activism in Protecting the Right to Equality in Bangladesh: Reflections on High Court Division’s verdict on Redefining Parental Identity in Student Information Forms

Judicial Activism in Protecting the Right to Equality in Bangladesh: Reflections on High Court Division’s verdict on Redefining Parental Identity in Student Information Forms

The case of BLAST and others vs. Bangladesh and others (Writ Petition No. 5343 0f 2009) challenged the mandatory requirement for students to provide their father’s name in examination registration...
Finding the Essence of Non-Retrogression: A Path to Stronger Social Rights Accountability

Finding the Essence of Non-Retrogression: A Path to Stronger Social Rights Accountability

Time and again, States have been warned by courts, UN bodies, and NGOs against taking retrogressive steps in economic and social rights. For instance, cuts to essential healthcare funding or...
Digital Control vs. Digital Rights: Critiquing Bangladesh’s Approach to Internet Shutdown

Digital Control vs. Digital Rights: Critiquing Bangladesh’s Approach to Internet Shutdown

Internet shutdowns obstruct universal access to internet, hindering freedom of expression, the right to information and right to peaceful assembly, economic security, education and health services for the citizens. Nonstop...
A Critical Analysis of the Indian Supreme Court’s Ruling on Same-Sex Marriage

A Critical Analysis of the Indian Supreme Court’s Ruling on Same-Sex Marriage

On October 17, 2024, the Supreme Court’s five-judge Constitution Bench ruled that same-sex couples do not have an unconditional right to marry, stating it is a matter for Parliament, and...
India’s Fight Against Sexual Harassment: SHe-Box’s Big Promises Leaves Bigger Gaps

India’s Fight Against Sexual Harassment: SHe-Box’s Big Promises Leaves Bigger Gaps

SHe-Box (Sexual Harassment electronic-Box), launched in 2017 under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013 (“PoSH Act”), was envisioned as a centralized platform to...
No results found.

Become A Contributor To The Blog