<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Transnational Human Rights Advocacy as the Contemporary Anti-Hegemon: Human Rights Implications for the BDS Movement	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/transnational-human-rights-advocacy-as-the-contemporary-anti-hegemon-human-rights-implications-for-the-bds-movement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/transnational-human-rights-advocacy-as-the-contemporary-anti-hegemon-human-rights-implications-for-the-bds-movement/</link>
	<description>Oxford Human Rights Hub</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:46:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: amiya p sen		</title>
		<link>https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/transnational-human-rights-advocacy-as-the-contemporary-anti-hegemon-human-rights-implications-for-the-bds-movement/#comment-99618</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[amiya p sen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 09:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://humanrights.dev3.oneltd.eu/?p=13764#comment-99618</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[dear Devarshi,
Read your piece with interest. Glad  that you can think and articulate yourself that well though there will always be  some margin for improvement. Understandably, your language is somewhat legalistic. I recommend that you try and bring some literary flavour to it. There is no surrogate for clarity and elegance as far as texts go. I did not entirely approve of the expression &quot;wide criteria&quot;. I know what you meant to convey but perhaps this could have been conveyed better. Also, cut down on the length of your sentences. I once had the same problem but have been trying to correct myself consistently.
with good wishes,
amiya]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dear Devarshi,<br />
Read your piece with interest. Glad  that you can think and articulate yourself that well though there will always be  some margin for improvement. Understandably, your language is somewhat legalistic. I recommend that you try and bring some literary flavour to it. There is no surrogate for clarity and elegance as far as texts go. I did not entirely approve of the expression &#8220;wide criteria&#8221;. I know what you meant to convey but perhaps this could have been conveyed better. Also, cut down on the length of your sentences. I once had the same problem but have been trying to correct myself consistently.<br />
with good wishes,<br />
amiya</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anirban		</title>
		<link>https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/transnational-human-rights-advocacy-as-the-contemporary-anti-hegemon-human-rights-implications-for-the-bds-movement/#comment-98440</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anirban]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2014 18:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://humanrights.dev3.oneltd.eu/?p=13764#comment-98440</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hey Devarshi.....
Really well composed man.....i loved it..although I admit there were parts I did not understand....
Hope to meet you soon.....
-Anirban]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Devarshi&#8230;..<br />
Really well composed man&#8230;..i loved it..although I admit there were parts I did not understand&#8230;.<br />
Hope to meet you soon&#8230;..<br />
-Anirban</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
