Beyond Sentencing Inconsistency: Understanding India’s Death Penalty Crisis – Anup Surendranath (National Law University, Delhi)

by | Sep 26, 2017

The Supreme Court of India while upholding the constitutionality of the death penalty in Bachan Singh (1980) developed the ‘rarest of rare’ doctrine to guide sentencing judges and much of the scholarship since then has focused on ‘arbitrary outcomes’ in sentencing. This seminar, however, will evaluate the experience of administering the death penalty in the world’s largest constitutional democracy based on extensive interviews with India’s death row prisoners and their families. While discussing the multiple crisis points in India’s criminal justice system, the seminar will also examine the appropriate role for an equality analysis in death penalty sentencing.

This seminar is being co-hosted with the Bonavero Institute of Human Rights, and will take place at Mansfield College, in the Gilly Leventis Seminar Room, within the Institute and based at the new Hands Building (shown on the map as Love Lane building). Please report to the Lodge on arrival and ask for directions.

Share this:

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Related Content

Democratic Dialogue and the Constitution-Alison Young (Oxford)

Democratic Dialogue and the Constitution-Alison Young (Oxford)

In partnership with The Programme for the Foundations of Law and Constitutional Government, the OxHRH has ...
Human Rights and Personal Identity-Prof Jill Marshall (Leicester)

Human Rights and Personal Identity-Prof Jill Marshall (Leicester)

Jill Marshall’s Human Rights Law and Personal Identity, published by Routledge in June 2014, explores the role ...
Prof Davina Cooper,  Law & Political Theory, University of Kent asks: What kind of world would you like to live in?

Prof Davina Cooper, Law & Political Theory, University of Kent asks: What kind of world would you like to live in?

What kind of world would you like to live in? In many countries of the global north, where pragmatism has replaced ...