Business Law Workshop: Vexatious Claims – A rational choice theory challenge to the case for employment tribunal fees

by | Nov 1, 2016

Jeremais Prassl (University of Oxford & OxHRH Associate) and Abi Adams (University of Oxford) will be speaking on the impact of employment tribunal fees.
Event date: 4 Nov 2016 – 1:00pm to 2:30pm
Venue: Faculty of Law – Seminar Room F

 

Since July 2013, recourse to Employment Tribunals in the United Kingdom has attracted fees of up to £1,200 for single claimants. The impact of this reform has been dramatic: within a year, claims dropped by nearly 80%. In this paper, we challenge the legality of the fee regime as introduced, suggesting that it is in clear violation of domestic and international norms, including Article 6(1) ECHR and the EU principle of effective judicial protection. Drawing on rational choice theory and empirical evidence, they argue that the resulting payoff structures, negative for the majority of successful claimants, strike at the very essence of these rights. The measures are furthermore disproportionate in light of the Government’s stated policy aims: fees have failed to transfer cost away from taxpayers, have failed to encourage early dispute resolution, and have failed to deter vexatious litigants. The only vexatious claims, theyfind, appear to be those which motivated the reforms in the first place.

 

 

Share this:

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Related Content

Michael Kirby – 'Sodomy Revived: The Supreme Court of India Reverses Naz'

Michael Kirby – 'Sodomy Revived: The Supreme Court of India Reverses Naz'

On Tuesday, 22 April 2014, the Hon Michael Kirby, Former Justice of the High Court of Australia gave a lecture for ...
Fostering A Community of Human Rights Scholars: Graduate Student Workshop

Fostering A Community of Human Rights Scholars: Graduate Student Workshop

Venue: Harold Lee Boardroom, Pembroke College Date: April 25th, 2017 Time: 1pm-6pm The Oxford Human ...
Call for participants: A comparative examination of the right to freedom of thought across multiple jurisdictions

Call for participants: A comparative examination of the right to freedom of thought across multiple jurisdictions

The right to freedom of thought is protected by numerous international human rights treaties including Article 18 ...