Human Rights for Future Generations Seminar: Moral Panic and Conceptual Paradoxes: Critiquing & Reframing the Call to Ban Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems

by | Nov 22, 2015

Seminar Tuesday, 24th November at 3pm Mackesy Room at Pembroke College

 Professor Chris Jenks, SMU Dedman School of Law, Dallas Texas

 Moral Panic and Conceptual Paradoxes: Critiquing & Reframing the Call to Ban Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems

Using the evocative term ‘killer robots’, the United Nations and human rights group reports claim that lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWS) are ‘almost a reality’ that ‘will leave humans utterly defenceless’. Yet talks at the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons have yielded more confusion than consensus for a ban on LAWS. This presentation attempts to explain why.

While employing moral panic has been effective marketing, it is impossible to reconcile with the fact that more than 30 militaries have employed defensive, anti-material, weapon systems capable of selecting and engaging targets without further human intervention largely without controversy for three decades. This presentation suggests narrowing the proposed ban from LAWS writ large to those weapon systems whose primary use is to target personnel.

All welcome, refreshments provided.
Supported by the Oxford Martin School Programme on Human Rights for Future Generations

Share this:

1 Comment

  1. Jyotiswaroop Pandey

    Moral panics need to be deconstructed, in relation to crime as well as war.

Submit a Comment

Related Content

The Continuing Impact of Brexit on Equality Rights

The Continuing Impact of Brexit on Equality Rights

The government has expressed its commitment to maintain equalities legislation post Brexit. The exclusion of the ...
Apply to the Nelson Mandela World Human Rights Moot Court Competition

Apply to the Nelson Mandela World Human Rights Moot Court Competition

The Oxford Law Faculty invites applications for the position in Oxford’s team in the 9th Nelson Mandela World ...
New Publication: ‘Sexual Orientation and Rights’ by Nicholas Bamforth (ed)

New Publication: ‘Sexual Orientation and Rights’ by Nicholas Bamforth (ed)

Debate about the rights of sexual minorities, whether individuals or members of same-sex couples, has become an ...