Special Advocates in the Adversarial System: A Panel Discussion

by | Mar 6, 2020

The panel will be held 31 March 2020, 6:00 pm–7:30 pm at Gideon Schreier LT, UCL Laws, Bentham House, Endsleigh Gardens, London.

Organised by UCL Centre for Criminal Law and 6KBW College Hill.

Speakers

  • Jonathan Hall QC (6KBW College Hill)
  • Tom Hickman QC (UCL & Blackstone Chambers)
  • Professor John Jackson (University of Nottingham)
  • Cathryn McGahey QC (Temple Garden Chambers)
  • Shaheen Rahman QC (One Crown Office Row)
  • Sir Stephen Silber (former High Court Judge)

About the event

The last twenty years have seen an unprecedented rise in the use of “closed material proceedings” largely brought about in response to the need to protect intelligence sources in the fight against terrorism. This has called into question the commitment of legal systems to long-cherished principles of adversarial justice and due process. Foremost among the measures designed to minimise the prejudice caused to parties who have been excluded from such proceedings has been the use of “special advocates” who are given access to sensitive national security material and can make representations to the court on behalf of excluded parties.

In 2019 Professor John Jackson published a study – the first of its kind – analysing the professional services special advocates offer across a range of different types of closed proceedings. Drawing on extensive interviews with special advocates and with lawyers and judges who have worked with them, his book examines the manner in which special advocates are appointed and supported, how their position differs from that of ordinary counsel within the adversarial system, and the challenges they face in the work that they do. In making an assessment of the future of special advocacy, Professor Jackson argues that there is a need to reconceptualise the unique role that special advocates play in the administration of justice.

This event, hosted by the UCL Centre for Criminal Law in conjunction with 6KBW College Hill, will provide an opportunity to discuss some of the findings made by Professor Jackson in his ground-breaking study.  In a panel discussion moderated by Jonathan Hall QC, Professor Jackson will begin by outlining some of the key points derived from his study. The other panellists, who have extensive experience of national security litigation from a variety of perspectives, will then provide their views on the special advocate system and its relationship to the adversarial process.  Time permitting, there will an opportunity for the audience to ask questions.

A reception hosted by 6KBW College Hill will follow the event.

To book your place see here. For more information visit here.

Share this:

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Related Content

Congratulations to OxHRH Administrator Zoe Davis Heaney

Congratulations to OxHRH Administrator Zoe Davis Heaney

A big congratulations to the former OxHRH administrator Zoe Davis Heaney on her new appointment as the permanent ...
Striking for Education in the Global South – Sit-in-Teach-out in support of UCU strike (4 March)

Striking for Education in the Global South – Sit-in-Teach-out in support of UCU strike (4 March)

The UCU is on strike this term, against stagnant, insufficient, and unequal pay for women and racial minorities, ...
A Conversation on Brexit’s Impact on Human Rights-Alison Young, Paul Craig, Nick Barber and Timothy Endicott (Oxford)

A Conversation on Brexit’s Impact on Human Rights-Alison Young, Paul Craig, Nick Barber and Timothy Endicott (Oxford)

Brexit and the recent High Court decision in Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union have ...