Supplementary Comparative Research on Secret Evidence

by | Mar 24, 2012

A closer examination of the procedure and practice in the United States: A report prepared by Oxford Pro Bono Publico for the Joint Committee on Human Rights (March 2012)

A follow-up to the 2011 comparative report on secret evidence, requested by the JCHR. It focused on the operation of security-cleared counsel in US habeas corpus proceedings as well as the US doctrine of State secrets privilege in order to help the JCHR assess whether those aspects of US practice should be adopted in the UK.

You can read the full report below, or download it here.  You can also browse all OPBP’s projects here.

Share this:

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Related Content

The Challenge of Human Rights Advocacy-Professor Francesca Klug (LSE)

The Challenge of Human Rights Advocacy-Professor Francesca Klug (LSE)

What is distinctive about human rights  advocacy? Does framing an issue in human rights terms produce specific ...
Fully Funded PhD at University of Liverpool: International Human Rights Law in Response to Climate Change

Fully Funded PhD at University of Liverpool: International Human Rights Law in Response to Climate Change

The University of Liverpool invites applications for a funded Doctoral Research scholarship at Liverpool Law ...
Professor Fredman Contributes to Major UN Women Report: Transforming Economies, Realizing Rights

Professor Fredman Contributes to Major UN Women Report: Transforming Economies, Realizing Rights

On 27 April 2015 OxHRH Director, Professor Sandra Fredman and OxHRH Deputy Directors, Meghan Campbell and Laura ...