• Home
  • About us
  • People
  • Blog
  • News
  • Media
    • Video
    • Webinars
    • Seminars
    • Podcasts
  • Publications
    • Journal Articles
    • Working Papers
    • OxHRH Annual Report
    • Books & Chapters
    • U of OxHRH Journal
  • Events
  • Journal
  • Oxford Pro Bono Publico
    • History and Impact
    • Team
    • Working with OPBP
    • Project Database
    • Internship Programme
  • Home
  • About us
  • People
  • Blog
  • Media
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Journal

US Congress Reauthorizes Violence Against Women Act

Guest Contributor - 1st March 2013
Gender Based Violence
1,300 American human rights organizations sent a letter to the House urging it to pass S.47.

By Chelsea Purvis – 

The United States Congress has for many months been debating the future of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA).  As I explained in my previous post, VAWA is the principle federal law addressing gender-based violence in the US.  When VAWA expired in 2012, the Senate drafted a reauthorization bill (S.47) that provides needed reforms to VAWA.  S.47 extends tribal jurisdiction over non-Natives in cases of domestic violence, and it expands protections for immigrants and LGBT victims of abuse.

Conservative Republicans in the House objected to the Senate’s bill.  They drafted their own reauthorization bill, excluding most of the Senate’s reforms.  But public pressure mounted on the House to drop its opposition to VAWA reforms. 1,300 American human rights organizations sent a letter to the House urging it to pass S.47.

By Tuesday it became clear that conservative Republicans in the House no longer had enough support to pass their alternative reauthorization bill.  The House then agreed on Wednesday to vote on the House’s version and then, if that bill failed to pass (as expected), to vote on S.47.

Yesterday, the US House rejected the House’s version and passed S.47 in a vote of 286-138.  President Obama will now sign the bill into law, reauthorizing VAWA and adding crucial protections for Native Americans, LGBT people, and immigrants.

Chelsea Purvis is a Yale Law School legal fellow at Minority Rights Group International in London (the opinions expressed in this post are her own).  She received her M.Phil. from Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar in 2008.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related blog posts

Brazilian Superior Court of Justice Decides that Victims of Domestic Violence are Entitled to Paid Work Leave – While New Legislation Could Hinder Their Right to an Adequate Standard of Living
The ILO adopts Convention concerning violence and harassment at work
The declaration of rape as an emergency in Sierra Leone needs to address legal ambiguities in order to combat the scourge of rape and gender-based violence

Related events

RightsUp Podcast – Ep1: Old Problems, New Media: Revenge Porn and the Law
OxHRH

Related news

OPBP Completes Report on Reparations and Remedies for Victims of Sexual and Gender Based Violence

Contact Us

oxfordhumanrightshub@law.ox.ac.uk

Oxford Human Rights Hub
The Faculty of Law, University of Oxford,
St Cross Building,
St Cross Road,
Oxford OX1 3UL

© 2019 Oxford Human Rights Hub | Site by One


Sign up for the OHRH Newsletter

Your email address*:

New email sign up
reCAPTCHA
* Find out how we use your data