Canada to Hold National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls

by | Sep 2, 2016

author profile picture

About Brian Bird

Brian Bird is a doctoral student in law at McGill University in Montreal, Canada. Brian holds a B.A. from Simon Fraser University, a J.D. from the University of Victoria, and a B.C.L. from the University of Oxford.


Brian Bird “Canada to Hold National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls” (OxHRH Blog, 2 September 2016) <> [Date of Access]

On August 3, 2016, the government of Canada announced a National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls (the “Inquiry”). The Commission’s mandate is “to examine and report on the systemic causes behind the violence that Indigenous women and girls experience and their greater vulnerability to that violence”. The Commission has also been directed to make recommendations on how to remedy these problems. The Inquiry was invoked pursuant to Canada’s Inquiries Act. This legislation empowers the Commission, in the course of its work, to compel witnesses to testify and produce documents.

A Commission made up of five individuals will conduct the Inquiry:

  • Chief commissioner Marion Buller, the first female First Nations judge appointed in the province of British Columbia;
  • Michèle Audette, a former president of the Québec Native Women’s Association;
  • Qajaq Robinson, a Nunavut-born lawyer who practices civil litigation with a focus on First Nations communities;
  • Marilyn Poitras, a law professor at the University of Saskatchewan with expertise in constitutional and aboriginal law; and
  • Brian Eyolfson, deputy director of the legal services branch in Ontario’s Ministry of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation.

The initial budget for the Inquiry is $53.86 million. The Commission will begin its work on September 1, 2016. It is to provide its interim recommendations to the government in the fall of 2017 and a final report by the end of 2018.

For several years indigenous and non-indigenous organisations called on the federal government to call the Inquiry. In 2004, Amnesty International published a report which noted that indigenous women in Canada aged 25 to 44 were five times more likely than all other women to die as a result of violence. Despite evidence of this sort, resistance to an inquiry persisted. The previous Canadian government, defeated by an election in October 2015, refused on several occasions to call an inquiry. After a detailed inquiry, the Committee on the Convention of the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women found that Canada’s effort to address violence against Aboriginal women was ‘inadequate in light of the gravity of the situation.’ The previous government justified its position on the basis that sufficient evidence had either already been or was being collected, such that resources should be directed towards concrete remedial change instead of further study.

The UN’s Special Rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples gave voice to the counterargument to this position in a 2014 report. During a visit to Canada, James Anaya “heard consistent, insistent calls across the country for a comprehensive, nationwide inquiry, organized in consultation with indigenous peoples, that could provide an opportunity for the voices of the victims’ families to be heard, deepen understanding of the magnitude and systemic dimensions of the issue, and identify best practices that could lead to an adequately coordinated response.” In short, meaningful change is impossible unless the nature and causes of the problem are known and understood.

Further impetus for the Inquiry appeared in a 2014 report of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP). The report detailed 1,181 cases of missing and murdered indigenous women in Canada from 1980-2012. The report confirmed that indigenous women are over-represented in the category of cases of missing and murdered women in Canada and that the total number of missing and murdered indigenous women surpassed previous estimates. An update to the report in 2015 noted 32 additional murders and 11 additional disappearances of indigenous women.

It bears noting that the authoring of these reports by Canada’s largest police force is an additional source of pain and frustration, especially for the loved ones of missing and murdered indigenous women. Many view police as part of the problem insofar that police fail to provide adequate protection for indigenous women or to take their concerns seriously (in contrast to other segments of the Canadian population). The Commission will almost certainly be confronted with the issue of policing in the context of indigenous women – whether the Commission takes up the issue in its findings and recommendations remains to be seen.

The principal point of contention between the critics and supporters of the Inquiry is whether it is needed to effect change. This division reveals important common ground: both sides believe that meaningful change for indigenous women in Canada must come – and come as soon as possible.

Share this:

Related Content

1 Comment

  1. Ignacio de Casas

    Dear Brian (such a long time pal!). Great post, thanks for this!
    Do you know if there was consultation with indigenous peoples on how to do the Inquiry, how to conform the commission, etc? One of you sources states: “In December, the newly elected Liberals started preinquiry consultations, which were conducted across the country over the course of three months.” but I wonder if those were consultations with indigenous peoples, respecting all the international standards re FPIC, or just political consultations.

Submit a Comment