Updates on the Modern Slavery Act 2015: government showing signs of long-awaited leadership

by | Jul 26, 2019

author profile picture

About Lisa Hsin

Lisa Hsin is a doctoral candidate at the University of Oxford. Her research is an empirical study of transparency regulations in action with a particular focus on the Modern Slavery Act 2015. She is a Research Assistant at the Bonavero Institute of Human Rights and co-covener of the Oxford Business and Human Rights Research Network.


Lisa Hsin “Updates on the Modern Slavery Act 2015: government showing signs of long-awaited leadership” (OxHRH Blog, 2019) <https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/updates-on-the-modern-slavery-act-2015:-government-showing-signs-of-long-awaited leadership> [Date of Access].

In the past year, the UK government has made unprecedented efforts to increase its engagement with the Modern Slavery Act 2015 (MSA). Commentators have long criticised the Act for not working as intended and with the introduction of stricter, more innovative regulatory measures such as the French Duty of Vigilance Law 2017, Australia’s Modern Slavery Act 2018 and New South Wales’ Modern Slavery Act 2018, the government could no longer claim that the MSA was the world’s leading modern slavery legislation.

In response, it commissioned an Independent Review, instigated a Home Affairs Select Committee Inquiry into Modern Slavery, appointed a new Independent Anti-Slavery Commissioner in February, initiated an audit of Anti-Slavery and Trafficking Statements and most recently, announced funding of £10 million for modern slavery research. These activities suggest that serious reforms are imminent.

The Independent Review

In July 2018, the government commissioned Frank Field MP, Maria Miller MP and Baroness Butler-Sloss to undertake an independent review of the MSA.

The final report of the Independent Review called for (among many other recommendations) greater independence for the Anti-Slavery Commissioner role, and more transparency in business supply chains with a list of companies which are required to comply with the Act. The final report was submitted to the Home Secretary on 29 March and was laid in Parliament on 22 May.

New Anti-Slavery Commissioner

Following the sudden and controversial resignation of the UK’s first Independent Anti-Slavery Commissioner, Kevin Hyland OBE in May 2018, the government faced pressure to quickly find a replacement. Eight months later, the government finally appointed a new Independent Anti-Slavery Commissioner, Dame Sara Thornton, who began her term on 1 May.

But the government’s decision to appoint a new Commissioner while the Independent Review was in progress fuelled concerns expressed by Kevin Hyland that the government had unduly interfered in his role. Frank Field MP, found the appointment ‘so surprising’ that he said he would be seeking to instigate parliamentary scrutiny of the role, post-appointment. He outlined his concerns in the final report of the Independent Review and included recommendations that future appointments should be made subject to a pre-appointment hearing by a Parliamentary Select Committee.

Home Office Audit

Section 54, which requires companies turning over £36 million to produce Anti-Slavery and Trafficking statements annually, is one of the most criticised provisions in the Act for its lack of enforcement powers and sanctions. A scathing assessment by the Office of Public Accounts caused the Home Office to reconsider its ‘hands-off’ approach to section 54. Following this, the Home Office reached out to 17,000 companies in October 2018, advising them to ‘open up on modern slavery’ or risk being ‘named and shamed’ on a list of non-compliant companies.

At the same time, the Modern Slavery Registry, being one of two non-governmental registries for Anti-Slavery and Trafficking statements in the UK, wrote to 6,200 UK businesses which had not yet produced a statement. The civil-society-run registry also warned these companies of the risk of being listed as non-compliant. The extent of overlap and co-ordination between the two initiatives is unclear, but it highlights a clear need for enforcement to be streamlined.

What’s next? Investment and Reform

The government is now considering the recommendations of the Independent Review and due to respond formally. But its intention to make changes to the MSA was clearly outlined by the Prime Minister, Theresa May in her speech on 11 June to the International Labour Organisation in Geneva. She announced the government’s commitment to not only continue but ‘accelerate’ the fight against modern slavery with the ‘launch [of] a new central registry of modern slavery transparency statements’. Victoria Atkins MP, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for the Home Department also expressed support for the recommendations made in the final report during a Westminster Hall Debate on 19 June. However, she was more cautious, advising that a consultation would be held. On 9 July, as one of her final acts as Prime Minister, Mrs May announced funding worth £10 million over five years for a new Policy and Evidence Centre for Modern Slavery and Human Rights. The Centre will have a multi-disciplinary approach to policy-focussed research, which aims to advance understanding and provide solutions to the social problem.

In light of these recent acts, the government has evidently adjusted its approach. Based on the number of outstanding issues on its to-do list, the momentum of government-led action around the MSA looks set to continue.

Share this:

Related Content