
On Thursday the High Court of Australia effectively struck down the nation’s first same-sex marriage laws. But ...

There are many things wrong about the 98 page decision of the Indian Supreme Court in Suresh Kumar Koushal v NAZ ...

The purpose of refugee law is to give sanctuary to people fleeing persecution because of some aspect of their ...

Ladele (see previous posts) exemplifies an important public debate: has the embrace of gay equality by the liberal ...

In the case of Vallianatos and Others v. Greece, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights held that ...

The Australian Capital Territory made Australian history this week as the first Australian jurisdiction to provide ...

In the western hemisphere, the Anglophone Caribbean maintains some of the most regressive anti-gay laws in the ...

Last month marked the 10 year anniversary of Lawrence v Texas, where the US Supreme Court ruled that laws that ...

On Friday 26th July, in Cape Town, the United Nations launched a new international campaign to counter homophobia, ...

In a follow-up post to his previous analysis of Windsor v. United States, Karl Laird examines which constitutional ...

In light of the release of Windsor v the United States, Karl Laird analyzes the US Supreme Court's reasoning, ...

This is an edited transcript of an address given by Aidan O'Neill QC on Thursday 13 June 2013, at Matrix Chambers ...